Related%20passage for Bava Kamma 212:12

ולישני ליה בבן פקועה כר"מ דאמר בן פקועה טעון שחיטה

that a slaughter which does not [render the animal ritually] fit for consumption is still designated [in law] slaughter.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So that the law of fourfold and fivefold payments will apply which is also the anonymous view stated supra p. 403. ');">²¹</span> But again, why not answer that the ox was an animal taken alive out of a slaughtered mother's womb [and as such it may be eaten<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. Hul. IV, 5. ');">²²</span>

Explore related%20passage for Bava Kamma 212:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.